WEKO3
アイテム
相模大堰事件・再考:水需要予測と行政裁量を考えるために
https://aikoku-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000046
https://aikoku-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/200004659b94794-5600-4b45-843d-975fa1d9430e
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2025-05-15 | |||||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||||
タイトル | 相模大堰事件・再考:水需要予測と行政裁量を考えるために | |||||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||||
タイトル | Reconsideration on the Case of Local Residents Lawsuit against Sagami Big Weir Construction: A Critical Judgement about Projection of Future Water Consumption and Administrative Discretion | |||||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||||
主題 | 神奈川県内広域水道企業団 | 相模大堰 | 住民訴訟 | 水需要予測 | 行政裁量 | |||||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||||
主題 | Kanagawa Water Supply Authority | Sagami Big Weir | Local Residents' Lawsuit | Projection of Future Water Consumption | Administrative Discretion | |||||||||||||
雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||||
収録物識別子 | AA1135787X | |||||||||||||
著者 |
梶原, 健嗣
× 梶原, 健嗣
|
|||||||||||||
記事種別(日) | ||||||||||||||
内容記述 | 紀要論文 | |||||||||||||
記事種別(英) | ||||||||||||||
内容記述 | Department Bulletin Paper | |||||||||||||
抄録(英) | ||||||||||||||
内容記述 | KWSA (Kanagawa Water Supply Authority) was founded on May 1, 1969, and it was created as a model of wholesale water supply services in Japan. KWSA had developed water supply infrastructure centered around Sagami River. In 1980, it began to reinforce water supply capacity of Sagami River; Miyagase Dam was constructed as a water source, while Sagami Big Weir was built for water intake. In March 1993, 23 residents of Kanagawa prefecture filed a local residents' suit attempting to prohibit expenditure on the construction of Sagami Big Weir. The first trial took place in the Yokohama District Court, which delivered its judgment in February 2001. It was against the plaintiffs and judgements of higher umpire were same. Despite of the importance of KWSA and Sagami Big Weir mentioned above, the suit was received little attention. This is evidenced by the fact that only the first trial statement was published in a professional journal, and only in one journal. However, the Yokohama District Court's judgment, which emphasized the requirement for governments to reconsider projections after the commencement of a project and noted potential illegitimacy due to administrative discretion abuse, is significant in this era of degrowth. |
|||||||||||||
書誌情報 |
愛国学園大学人間文化研究紀要 Human and Cultural Sciences ; The Journal of Aikoku Gakuen University 号 27, p. 51-70, 発行日 2025-03 |
|||||||||||||
表示順 | ||||||||||||||
内容記述 | 5 | |||||||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||||
収録物識別子 | 1344705X |